|
|
Answer: Let me tackle the score question
first. While you would expect to see similar numbers for the same
caption, it’s not always the case. This can be due to a couple of
things.
(1)
One judge may always seem to end up
sampling the “wrong” people (depending upon your point of view).
Just your luck, they end up looking at the clarinets trying to build
that linear form with no reference points, and then they move to the
color guard who NEVER can get that 16-count phrase together. They
follow that with a sampling of the battery percussion who just put
those 10 pages of drill on this morning! The other judge, however,
focused his/her efforts on the trumpets who worked those diamond
cutters to death this week, and then they move to the rifles who
proudly displayed the results of three sectionals they held the
previous week. At the end of the show, you can easily have two
different views of the program which may affect the scoring range.
(2)
One judge has a slightly different
tolerance than the other. Although all judges strive to be
consistent in their evaluations, judges who are regularly seeing
bands from around the country may have a slightly different
threshold for error vs. someone who is only judging within Kentucky
each weekend. A performance level that earns a 65 from one judge
may only warrant a 55 from the other. And keep in mind that is
always divided by 10, so you don’t really have a 10 point
difference, but a SINGLE point (and trust me, most judges know
this). If the judge who gave you the 55 has you in first place (as
did the judge who gave you the 65), chances are his/her numbers are
probably lower for every band throughout the course of the contest.
The rankings (ordinals) are
sometimes a little harder to explain. If I have a caption
counterpart, I always first look at the ordinals within a class or
contest. If I’ve placed a group 1st and my colleague has
them 4th, I then look at our spread between those
ordinals. If we’ve both stacked our top four bands within .8 of a
point, we’ve basically stated that those groups are fairly equal and
very minor differences affected our rankings. If those bands went
right back out and performed again, we both potentially could have
them in a completely different order. In this instance, the
ordinals combined with the spreads don’t throw up any “yellow
flags”. However, if I had my first place band 2.0 points ahead of
the balance of the pack and my colleague had the same band in fourth
(3.0 points behind his front runner), we obviously have some
differences. We will frequently discuss what we saw in each program
and how it affected our score. At the shows that offer critique, we
will then discuss our numbers with that band’s staff during that
time and what prompted us to assign that score. Yes, there are
times when a judge just may “miss it”. We are human, just like
anyone else. It’s discussions like these that happen between judges
after the show that help drive a better level of consistency. |
|